Rolf Harris And You
Re the above, this video was uploaded on September 5, 2014. On September 19, I deleted the original and replaced it with a better quality version. It was compiled from 108 separate clips; 15 of these clips were re-recorded. Originally the video lasted for 83 minutes 9 seconds. The improved version runs to 83 minutes 7 seconds (downloaded). Having played it through I am as happy as I could hope to be with the sound quality, although the volume may require adjusting here and there.
To IMDb entry for Rolf Harris And You
The illustrated, annotated transcript (my text only) can be found on my main website at this link.
The links below are in the order in which they are mentioned:
To Queen Victoria Hospital report
To Queen Mary's Hospital Carshalton report
To Wythenshawe Hospital report
To Booth Hall Hospital report
To Lynda Lee-Potter article
To McMartin case - university law page
To Robert Sheaffer review of The Courage To Heal
To Debunking feminist rape statistics
To Kelly Michaels case - university law page
This video contains clips downloaded from the YouTube website and photographs gleaned from various sources. Copyright remains with the original author(s) [or whoever holds it at the time of this publication]; they are reproduced here as “Fair use” for the purposes of “criticism, comment...reporting, teaching, scholarship, [AND] research” in compliance with Chapter 1, S107 of the Copyright Law of the United States of America.
Alexander Baron but see above details re content.
Subject: This Film Is Trash cnt
Do you honestly believe it is a coincidence that a plumber reported this and so many women came forward about Rolf Harris?
By not mentioning evidence because YOU decide it isn't true you are being selective about what you chose to tell people about it.
Nicholas Edwards was accused twice convicted of rape. He was accused five more times but the juries found that there wasn't enough evidence to convict him. What does that prove? Do you really think that he was twice wrongly convicted of rape and 5 more women falsely accused him? Or has it occurred to you that he was a rapist (proven twice in court) and there wasn't always a enough evidence to convict him?
As for Vanessa Feltz's appearance; that is nasty and irrelevant. People of all weights, ages and attractiveness levels get targeted by sex offenders. Elderly women get targeted and Jill Saward the Ealing Vicarage rape victim wasn't a good looking woman. To assume that a person is lying because they are not attractive gives sex offenders the freedom to target unattractive people knowing that their victims won't be believed. It also tells people who don't look a certain way that if they come forward about being targeted the reaction they will get is "Who in their right mind would molest/sexually assault etc them". Horrible
People who suffer from mental illnesses have enough stigma to deal with in their lives without being called nasty names like "fruitcake". Or assumed to be lying simply because they have had mental health issues. It is common for people with mental health issues to have been sexually abused as that kind of abuse often effects mental health. Not to mentions that sex offenders often target those who are vulnerable making people with mental health issues frequent targets.
You call someone a liar because they are in YOUR opinion. Not because they have been proven to be. The accusers of Jim Davidson, Michael LeVel etc were not proven to be lying. The juries looked at the evidence and decided there wasn't enough to convict. That doesn't mean they decided that the accusers lied. Do you think that a jury always knows who is telling the truth? Or do you think that sometimes juries don't know so they find not guilty? If those women were proven to be lying they would have been charged.
Subject: Reply to Mia DiRossi
The allegations against Harris by ten women were not "pure coincidence"; compare the allegations against him or anyone else in the public eye with those made against Nicholas Edwards and you will understand, or a rational person would understand.
Your other claims are equally baseless. I think it is acceptable to call a liar a liar. I did not dismiss the groping of 8 year olds as no big deal, rather I said the allegation that Rolf Harris groped an 8 year old is either a lie or more probably a fantasy by a woman who is 3 sandwiches short of a picnic. The groping of underage girls - and boys - that occurs at American airports has rightly caused widespread outrage, but has it ruined their lives?
The rape of a "harlot" is still a rape, but it is clearly less terrible than the rape of a child. As for taking the side of the sex abusers, refer to what I said about Joshua Komisarjevsky.
If you are typical of the type of women who accuse Rolf Harris and other celebrities I would find them not guilty every time because clearly you wouldn't recognise the truth if it hit you in the face.